data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e919/2e919ba13090abe71723d6774f17132ffcf93ec5" alt=""
What throws me off is the BASE of this statue, with the Ripley-7 corpse. Are you kidding me?!?!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3daa/a3daa5af5828b2e46bc4e25833ec9e16b62195f6" alt=""
---
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9020d/9020d040341a13c1ff2fb16412349831635f0d5d" alt=""
But I will say the sculptor(s) of this statue have done some nice work. The Newborn, as a stand-alone creature separate from the Alien Mythos, looks much better than its film counterpart. In fact, as a creature, its pretty creepy. And again, I am only referring to this statue.
I will say I wish this Newborn statue was GRENDEL'S MOTHER in Zemekis' turdostomy "Beowulf", instead of the video game Angelina Jolie. Anyway, if you look at its base, you can see that its intended to be displayed with the Alien Resurrection Warrior with nude Ripley-7 corpse base.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a58ca/a58cae48a96b4900b56fe0cb35de97a7e6f556b5" alt=""
1 comment:
You know, now that I've seen Cloverfield, the Newborn doesn't seem so bad.
Post a Comment